The Universality of Myth Archetypes and Social Interaction
A peculiar aspect of human culture and consciousness is the significantly pervasive use and the value given to symbolism. These are not just intangible aspects of human beliefs and repositories of heritage. Symbols come to be the focal point by which a society is bound together and share a single cultural base. These popular and usually relatable symbols become the socio - cultural externalities by means of which social interaction to transpire. In the humanities and literature and even social psychology, they are referred to as archetypes by which humans rationalize and nuance certain suggestions and values. In most situations these are applied to myths and legends of a particular culture.
In spite of cultural diversity and distinctiveness, these archetypes turn out to be a recurring concept and enable cultures to interact and deal with one one more. Regards of heritage they generally employ the same archetypes. The concept of the Hero's journey or quest is a universal archetype, primarily in the realm of myth. The story of Jason, Beowulf, Genji and other people might possibly be different but share a repeated pattern of events and ideas. The concept that in a hero's journey, there are companions like the rogue, the mentor and the maiden also resonate all through the plethora of myths identified these days. Do they indicate cultural distinctiveness? Does this not run counter to the idea that cultures are exclusive? How is this reconciled with the proposition that these myth archetypes are universal?
All cultures and the heritage they possess are all one of a kind. Their details, values conveyed and nuances are 1 of a type. Still, the common framework is universal. A close examination of every culture will reveal that though others developed in many different other places, the themes and elements are strikingly similar. Despite the different contexts and the history of the culture, the archetypes are produced manifest once more and again. This recursion raises the question had been these all from a single cultural heritage? Alternatively, that this phenomenon is for the reason that of the human psyche at play in the development of these many myths. This binds folks of numerous cultures together and gives them a method of externalities to interact on. The value systems of numerous society can be understood from the standpoint of one other by referring to the archetypes put to use. This is also discovered in the cultural frame of the latter. Cultures can be unique and are built to retain that, but inherently they are also meant to interact with others. The social nature of man dictates that his worldview and orientation accommodate those of others.
This outlines the reality that the universality of myths is the basis for the social alter that brings about multi - culturalism. The interaction of people their own exclusive heritage is facilitated by the myth which every culture has. Striping away the particulars and actual message of these stories what is left is the archetype frame which appeals to all cultures. This enables a substantial degree of social interaction. Myths serve as the universal externality that anybody can relate to and determine with. This establishes a cross-cultural means by which folks relate to one a different.